ABHISHEK SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,BHUPENDRA SINGH — CRLR/3897/2024
Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC013921922024
Filing Number
CRLR/155016/2024
Filing Date
29-Jul-2024
Registration No
CRLR/3897/2024
Registration Date
31-Jul-2024
Judge
Harvir Singh
Coram
Harvir Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Revision against in any matter in 125 Cr. P. C. (Except order of Interim Maintenance ) ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK SHARMA
Adv. BHUVNESH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,BHUPENDRA SINGH
-
2.SMT. YOGITA
Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH
-
3.VIYOMINI ALIAS VISHAKHA
Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
Summary of CRLR No. 3897/2024 The Allahabad High Court dismissed Abhishek Sharma's revision petition challenging the Family Court's maintenance order of Rs. 10,000 monthly to his wife and Rs. 5,000 to their child. The court upheld the award, finding that matrimonial discord arose from caste discrimination by the husband's family, the child was legitimate issue of the marriage, and the wife's MBA qualification did not guarantee employment at the time of the order. The court held the Family Court properly assessed the husband's income and maintenance obligations based on evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
10-Feb-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
03-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
27-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
05-Jan-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
08-Dec-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
24-Nov-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
28-Oct-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
22-Sep-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
18-Aug-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
06-Aug-2025
Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
30-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
23-Jul-2025
As Fresh
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
04-Jun-2025
Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
28-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
21-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
16-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
08-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
01-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
24-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
17-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
09-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
03-Apr-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
26-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
19-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
10-Mar-2025
—
Samit Gopal
-
03-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
21-Jan-2025
Ram Manohar Narayan MishraView PDF
-
21-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
10-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
03-Jan-2025
Fresh
Saurabh Srivastava
-
17-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
10-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
03-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
26-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
19-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
11-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
28-Oct-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
21-Oct-2024
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
04-Oct-2024
—
Shree Prakash Singh
-
26-Sep-2024
Fresh
Vivek Varma
-
20-Sep-2024
—
Krishan Pahal
-
12-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/3897/2024
Summary of CRLR No. 3897/2024 The Allahabad High Court dismissed Abhishek Sharma's revision petition challenging the Family Court's maintenance order of Rs. 10,000 monthly to his wife and Rs. 5,000 to their child. The court upheld the award, finding that matrimonial discord arose from caste discrimination by the husband's family, the child was legitimate issue of the marriage, and the wife's MBA qualification did not guarantee employment at the time of the order. The court held the Family Court properly assessed the husband's income and maintenance obligations based on evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts