MITHLESH vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,ANJEET SINGH — BAIL/23554/2025
Disposed: -- on 21st April 2026.
CNR: UPHC013197982025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
BAIL/23554/2025
Registration Date
04-Jul-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MITHLESH
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA,DHANANJAY SHUKLA,DHANANJAY SHUKLA, ,DHANANJAY SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,ANJEET SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
20-Mar-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
The Allahabad High Court granted interim bail to Mithlesh for four weeks in a case involving charges under Sections 87, 137(2), 64 BNS and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act. The applicant's counsel argued the relationship was consensual and the couple intended to marry, while the state opposed bail contending innocence cannot be determined at pre-trial stage. The court granted interim bail on a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-harassment of witnesses, and regular court appearance, with the case listed for April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
05-Jan-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
09-Dec-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
26-Nov-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
29-Oct-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
09-Oct-2025
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
15-Sep-2025
—
Samit Gopal
-
05-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2025
Samit GopalView PDF
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/23554/2025
The Allahabad High Court granted interim bail to Mithlesh for four weeks in a case involving charges under Sections 87, 137(2), 64 BNS and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act. The applicant's counsel argued the relationship was consensual and the couple intended to marry, while the state opposed bail contending innocence cannot be determined at pre-trial stage. The court granted interim bail on a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-harassment of witnesses, and regular court appearance, with the case listed for April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts