SUBHASH RAJBHAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,ASHISH TYAGI — NA528/22200/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376. Disposed: -- on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Jun-2025

CNR: UPHC013025862025

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

19-Jun-2025

Registration No

NA528/22200/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Judge

Chawan Prakash

Coram

Chawan Prakash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous under the Head of Crl. Misc. Applications ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH RAJBHAR

    Adv. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,ASHISH TYAGI

  2. 2.INFORMANT

    Adv. ASHISH TYAGI

  3. 3.THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

    Adv. ASHISH TYAGI

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

    Adv. ASHISH TYAGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Chawan PrakashView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/22200/2025 The Allahabad High Court allowed Subhash Rajbhar's Section 528 BNSS application to quash criminal proceedings arising from a 2013 case involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3/4. The court found that the applicant and the informant (opposite party no. 2) had amicably settled their dispute out of court, and the trial court verified the compromise. The court held that no useful purpose would be served by continuing prosecution when both parties agreed to settlement, relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting compromise even in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    As Fresh

    Tarun Saxena

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Tarun SaxenaView PDF

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    —

    Alok Mathur

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  20. 11-Sep-2025

    —

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    As Fresh

    Avnish Saxena

  22. 18-Aug-2025

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

  23. 18-Aug-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  24. 30-Jul-2025

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF

  25. 30-Jul-2025

    —

    Prashant Kumar

  26. 23-Jul-2025

    —

    Prashant Kumar

  27. 16-Jul-2025

    —

    Prashant Kumar

  28. 09-Jul-2025

    —

    Prashant Kumar

  29. 02-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 19-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/22200/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/22200/2025 The Allahabad High Court allowed Subhash Rajbhar's Section 528 BNSS application to quash criminal proceedings arising from a 2013 case involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3/4. The court found that the applicant and the informant (opposite party no. 2) had amicably settled their dispute out of court, and the trial court verified the compromise. The court held that no useful purpose would be served by continuing prosecution when both parties agreed to settlement, relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting compromise even in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case