ABHISHEK vs State of U.P. AND 2 Others Advocate - G.A., ,MOHAMMAD ZAKIR — CRLR/2883/2024
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC012978732024
Filing Number
CRLR/115657/2024
Filing Date
24-May-2024
Registration No
CRLR/2883/2024
Registration Date
29-May-2024
Judge
Harvir Singh
Coram
Harvir Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Revision against in any matter in 125 Cr. P. C. (Except order of Interim Maintenance ) ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK
Adv. JAI PRAKASH,BIPIN KUMAR,BIPIN KUMAR, ,BIPIN KUMAR,BIPIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P. AND 2 Others Advocate - G.A., ,MOHAMMAD ZAKIR
-
2.SATVIK
Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAKIR
-
3.SMT. SHALVI
Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAKIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
Summary of CRLR No. 2883/2024 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Abhishek's revision petition challenging a Family Court maintenance award of Rs. 15,000 to his wife (opposite party 2) and Rs. 6,000 to their minor son. The court held the award proportionate to his salary of Rs. 93,458 (January 2024) as a GST customs officer, finding no illegality in the lower court's order based on Supreme Court precedent. However, the wife may seek revision if the 8th Pay Commission salary recommendations are implemented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
11-Feb-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Kshitij Shailendra
-
19-Dec-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
16-Oct-2025
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
09-Oct-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
25-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
18-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
11-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
03-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
27-Aug-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
21-Aug-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
13-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
06-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
30-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
23-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
16-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
09-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
02-Jul-2025
—
Siddharth
-
25-Jun-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
18-Jun-2025
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Jun-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
04-Jun-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
28-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
21-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
16-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
08-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
01-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
24-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
17-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
09-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
03-Apr-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
26-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
19-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
10-Mar-2025
—
Samit Gopal
-
03-Mar-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
21-Feb-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
14-Feb-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
06-Feb-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
28-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
21-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
10-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
03-Jan-2025
Fresh
Saurabh Srivastava
-
17-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
10-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
03-Dec-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
26-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
19-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
11-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
31-Aug-2024
—
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2024
Nalin Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
24-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/2883/2024
Summary of CRLR No. 2883/2024 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Abhishek's revision petition challenging a Family Court maintenance award of Rs. 15,000 to his wife (opposite party 2) and Rs. 6,000 to their minor son. The court held the award proportionate to his salary of Rs. 93,458 (January 2024) as a GST customs officer, finding no illegality in the lower court's order based on Supreme Court precedent. However, the wife may seek revision if the 8th Pay Commission salary recommendations are implemented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts