GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SHER SINGH (DECEASED) AND 2 OTHERS — FAPL/1014/2025

Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC012746102025

Filing Number

FAPLD/

Filing Date

24-May-2025

Registration No

FAPL/1014/2025

Registration Date

27-Sep-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 301100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. TEJASVI MISRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHER SINGH (DECEASED) AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ,AKANKSHA GAUR,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.NEPAL SINGH

    Adv. C.S.C. AKANKSHA GAUR

  3. 3.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. C.S.C. AKANKSHA GAUR

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF

    Summary of FAPL 1014/2025: The Allahabad High Court admitted Ghaziabad Development Authority's appeal against the lower court's award of Rs. 163/- per square yard compensation for land acquisition in Ghaziabad (1991). The Authority contended the highest comparable transaction was only Rs. 112.85/sq yd, while land owners argued they deserved higher compensation with 5% yearly escalation from an identical 1988 acquisition case. The Court stayed the impugned judgment, conditional on the Authority depositing the enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released to owners and 50% held in fixed deposit pending final decision after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  15. 16-Dec-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  18. 25-Nov-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  20. 12-Nov-2025

    —

    Neeraj Tiwari

  21. 04-Nov-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  23. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 24-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAPL/1014/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of FAPL 1014/2025: The Allahabad High Court admitted Ghaziabad Development Authority's appeal against the lower court's award of Rs. 163/- per square yard compensation for land acquisition in Ghaziabad (1991). The Authority contended the highest comparable transaction was only Rs. 112.85/sq yd, while land owners argued they deserved higher compensation with 5% yearly escalation from an identical 1988 acquisition case. The Court stayed the impugned judgment, conditional on the Authority depositing the enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released to owners and 50% held in fixed deposit pending final decision after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case