GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs BRAHM SINGH (DECEASED) AND 22 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,AKANKSHA GAUR — FAPL/1001/2025
Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC012730702025
Filing Number
FAPLD/
Filing Date
23-May-2025
Registration No
FAPL/1001/2025
Registration Date
04-Oct-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 301100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Adv. TEJASVI MISRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRAHM SINGH (DECEASED) AND 22 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,AKANKSHA GAUR
-
2.VEER PAL SINGH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
3.NARENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
4.BALA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
5.UMESH DEVI
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
6.BRAJESH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
7.RAM SINGH (DECEASED)
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
8.UPENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
9.SATENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
10.BRIJ PAL (DECEASED)
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
11.DEEPAK KUMAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
12.DHARMENDRA KUMAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
13.NEERAJ CHAUDHARY
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
14.SMT. MAMTA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
15.VED PAL (DECEASED)
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
16.ANIL KUMAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
17.SMT. KAMLESH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
18.SANGEETA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
19.JYOTI CHAUDHARY
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
20.OMKAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
21.OMVEER
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
22.RAJ SINGH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
23.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
11-Feb-2026
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF
Case Summary: FAPL/1001/2025 The Allahabad High Court admitted Ghaziabad Development Authority's appeal challenging the lower court's award of Rs. 163/- per square yard compensation for land acquired in Ghaziabad in 1991. The court stayed the impugned judgment on condition that the appellant deposits the enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released to land owners and 50% held in fixed deposit pending final decision. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
06-Feb-2026
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
30-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
21-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
13-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
06-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
16-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
09-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
02-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
25-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Neeraj Tiwari
-
04-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
28-Oct-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FAPL/1001/2025
Case Summary: FAPL/1001/2025 The Allahabad High Court admitted Ghaziabad Development Authority's appeal challenging the lower court's award of Rs. 163/- per square yard compensation for land acquired in Ghaziabad in 1991. The court stayed the impugned judgment on condition that the appellant deposits the enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released to land owners and 50% held in fixed deposit pending final decision. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts