GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, GHAZIABAD, THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN vs TULSIRAM (DECEASED) AND 17 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,AKANKSHA GAUR — FAPL/1025/2025
Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC012700302025
Filing Number
FAPLD/
Filing Date
22-May-2025
Registration No
FAPL/1025/2025
Registration Date
27-Sep-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 301100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, GHAZIABAD, THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN
Adv. TEJASVI MISRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TULSIRAM (DECEASED) AND 17 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,AKANKSHA GAUR
-
2.LATE RAJVEER SINGH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
3.YOGENDRA SINGH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
4.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
5.NEETU
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
6.SAPNA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
7.RUBI
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
8.SMT. SAROJ
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
9.RAMVEER SINGH
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
10.NARENDRA KUMAR
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
11.AMILAL (DECEASED)
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
12.SURENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
13.VIJAYPAL
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
14.UDAYVEER
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
15.VIRENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
16.SURENDRA
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
17.PARVEEN
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
-
18.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR,
Adv. AKANKSHA GAUR
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
09-Apr-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
31-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
11-Feb-2026
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF
Case Summary: FAPL/1025/2025 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority against a lower court's land acquisition compensation award of Rs. 163/- per square yard. The appellant contended the compensation was excessive, citing market transactions at Rs. 112.85/- per square yard, while respondent-landowners argued precedent supported the awarded rate. The court stayed the impugned judgment on condition that the appellant deposits the full enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released immediately to landowners and 50% placed in fixed deposit pending final adjudication. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
06-Feb-2026
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
30-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
21-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
13-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
06-Jan-2026
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
16-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
09-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
02-Dec-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
25-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Neeraj Tiwari
-
04-Nov-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
28-Oct-2025
—
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FAPL/1025/2025
Case Summary: FAPL/1025/2025 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority against a lower court's land acquisition compensation award of Rs. 163/- per square yard. The appellant contended the compensation was excessive, citing market transactions at Rs. 112.85/- per square yard, while respondent-landowners argued precedent supported the awarded rate. The court stayed the impugned judgment on condition that the appellant deposits the full enhanced compensation within two months, with 50% released immediately to landowners and 50% placed in fixed deposit pending final adjudication. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts