LAL BAHADUR GUPTA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIA/18369/2023
Case under Mandamus/act Not Mentioned Section NA. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC012374532023
Filing Number
WRIA/131969/2023
Filing Date
26-Oct-2023
Registration No
WRIA/18369/2023
Registration Date
28-Oct-2023
Judge
Prakash Padia
Coram
Prakash Padia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )
Sub-Category
Salary and allowances ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAL BAHADUR GUPTA
Adv. BRAMH NARAYAN SINGH,ARCHANA SINGH,ARCHANA SINGH, ,ARCHANA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
19-May-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
06-Apr-2026
Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF
WRIT PETITION ALLOWED The High Court of Allahabad allowed the petition of Lal Bahadur Gupta, a retired Class-IV Office Peon from U.P. Police, and directed the State to refund Rs. 1,76,165/- that was deducted from his retiral dues due to erroneous pay scale revision. The court held that a Class-IV employee cannot be made to bear the burden of administrative errors and that consent given under duress after retirement cannot bind the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2025
—
Vikas Budhwar
-
21-May-2025
—
Ajit Kumar
-
30-Jan-2025
—
Neeraj Tiwari
-
02-Feb-2024
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
20-Dec-2023
Ajit KumarView PDF
-
20-Dec-2023
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
01-Nov-2023
Ajit KumarView PDF
-
01-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/18369/2023
WRIT PETITION ALLOWED The High Court of Allahabad allowed the petition of Lal Bahadur Gupta, a retired Class-IV Office Peon from U.P. Police, and directed the State to refund Rs. 1,76,165/- that was deducted from his retiral dues due to erroneous pay scale revision. The court held that a Class-IV employee cannot be made to bear the burden of administrative errors and that consent given under duress after retirement cannot bind the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts