AMIT SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,GURFAN ALI — NA419/213/2025

Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC012339852025

Filing Number

NA419D/

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

NA419/213/2025

Registration Date

16-May-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 378 Cr.P.C. for leave to appeal against order of acquittal by complainant ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT SHARMA

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,GURFAN ALI

  2. 2.DALCHAND

    Adv. GURFAN ALI

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

    In Criminal Misc. Application No. 213/2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, petitioner Amit Sharma's case was heard on April 7, 2026. The applicant was absent despite the case being in the revised list, while counsel for the private opposite party was present. The court adjourned the matter for listing after two months without rendering a substantive order on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    —

    Manoj Bajaj

  7. 08-Sep-2025

    Manoj BajajView PDF

  8. 08-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-May-2025

    Manoj BajajView PDF

  10. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA419/213/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Misc. Application No. 213/2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, petitioner Amit Sharma's case was heard on April 7, 2026. The applicant was absent despite the case being in the revised list, while counsel for the private opposite party was present. The court adjourned the matter for listing after two months without rendering a substantive order on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case