AMIT vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SANJEEV KUMAR,RAKESH KUMAR RATHORE — CRLA/4494/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 201,43-201. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC012215932025
Filing Number
CRLAD/
Filing Date
01-May-2025
Registration No
CRLA/4494/2025
Registration Date
03-May-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter where offence U/s 304B I.P.C. is involved (SB) ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT
Adv. ABHISHEK MAYANK,SHASHIKALA MANI TRIPATHI,SHASHIKALA MANI TRIPATHI, ,SHASHIKALA MANI TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SANJEEV KUMAR,RAKESH KUMAR RATHORE
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
—
Raj Beer Singh
-
18-May-2026
—
Raj Beer Singh
-
20-Mar-2026
Raj Beer SinghView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 4494/2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, appellant Amit challenged a lower court decision against the State of U.P. On March 20, 2026, Hon'ble Justice Raj Beer Singh adjourned the case for next hearing on May 18, 2026, as requested by counsel for both parties. No substantive order on merit was passed in this preliminary hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Raj Beer Singh
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Raj Beer Singh
-
21-Nov-2025
Raj Beer SinghView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
11-Sep-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
03-Sep-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
29-Aug-2025
For Admission
Deepak Verma
-
27-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2025
Vinod DiwakarView PDF
-
01-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/4494/2025
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 4494/2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, appellant Amit challenged a lower court decision against the State of U.P. On March 20, 2026, Hon'ble Justice Raj Beer Singh adjourned the case for next hearing on May 18, 2026, as requested by counsel for both parties. No substantive order on merit was passed in this preliminary hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts