MADHU VACHASPATI UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA RAM RAM SINGH, ,GAURAV TRIPATHI,V.B. YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — WRIC/66026/2011

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jan-2016

CNR: UPHC012186542011

Filing Number

WRIC/66026/2011

Filing Date

16-Nov-2011

Registration No

WRIC/66026/2011

Registration Date

16-Nov-2011

Judge

Satya Veer Singh , Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)

Coram

Satya Veer Singh , Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

URBAN LAND (CEILING & REGULATION) ACT 1976 ( 70100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHU VACHASPATI UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA RAM RAM SINGH, ,GAURAV TRIPATHI,V.B. YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Satya Veer Singh,saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)View PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya and others against the State of U.P., finding it infructuous since the District Magistrate (Respondent No. 3) had already acknowledged the existence of the school. Any interim orders were vacated accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    —

    Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    —

    Garima Prashad , Neeraj Tiwari

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    —

    Manoj Kumar Gupta , Siddharth Nandan

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    —

    Manoj Kumar Gupta , Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    —

    Swarupama Chaturvedi , Ajit Kumar

  8. 01-Nov-2015

    —

    No Tied Up

  9. 18-Nov-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Nov-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/66026/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya and others against the State of U.P., finding it infructuous since the District Magistrate (Respondent No. 3) had already acknowledged the existence of the school. Any interim orders were vacated accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case