CHANDRASEN ALIAS RAM CHANDRA AND ANOTHER vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/13781/2026
Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC012051972026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
WRIC/13781/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
AGRICULTURAL LOAN ( 30100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRASEN ALIAS RAM CHANDRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA,DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA, ,DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA
-
2.BABU RAM
Adv. DEEPANSHI SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,KRISHNA KANT SHUKLA,A.S.G.I.,AMRISH SAHAI 1123
-
2.DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES/ MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG
Adv. AMRISH SAHAI A.S.G.I. KRISHNA KANT SHUKLA
-
3.INDIAN BANK THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL OFFICE 66 RAJA JI SALAI
Adv. AMRISH SAHAI A.S.G.I. KRISHNA KANT SHUKLA
-
4.INDIAN BANK THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER BRANCH PAKADIA, NAUGAWA
Adv. AMRISH SAHAI A.S.G.I. KRISHNA KANT SHUKLA
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
10-Apr-2026
Vinod DiwakarView PDF
Case Summary: WRIC 13781/2026 Petitioner sought relief regarding a Kisan Credit Loan of Rs. 1,10,000 from Indian Bank after agricultural land was submerged by natural calamity, destroying crops and making repayment impossible. The court granted Indian Bank four weeks to submit the loan agreement and KCC terms, and adjourned the case to 26.5.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/13781/2026
Case Summary: WRIC 13781/2026 Petitioner sought relief regarding a Kisan Credit Loan of Rs. 1,10,000 from Indian Bank after agricultural land was submerged by natural calamity, destroying crops and making repayment impossible. The court granted Indian Bank four weeks to submit the loan agreement and KCC terms, and adjourned the case to 26.5.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts