SATYAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYA SAXENA — BAIL/12137/2026
Disposed: -- on 04th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC012048742026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
BAIL/12137/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Vivek Varma
Coram
Vivek Varma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYAM
Adv. ASHWINI KUMAR,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA, ,RAJA SINGH PARIHAR,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYA SAXENA
-
2.INFORMANT
Adv. PRIYA SAXENA
-
3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. PRIYA SAXENA
-
4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. PRIYA SAXENA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
17-Apr-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the bail application and released the case for fresh hearing before a different bench on 04.05.2026. The court clarified that the matter would not be treated as tied up or part-heard before Judge Krishan Pahal's bench, effectively transferring the case for de novo consideration by another judicial officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/12137/2026
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the bail application and released the case for fresh hearing before a different bench on 04.05.2026. The court clarified that the matter would not be treated as tied up or part-heard before Judge Krishan Pahal's bench, effectively transferring the case for de novo consideration by another judicial officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts