JAI CHANDRA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,JITENDRA SINGH — BAIL/12175/2026

Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC012034202026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

03-Apr-2026

Registration No

BAIL/12175/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Krishan Pahal

Coram

Krishan Pahal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI CHANDRA

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,JITENDRA SINGH

  2. 2.COMPLAINANT / FIRST INFORMANT

    Adv. JITENDRA SINGH

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

    Adv. JITENDRA SINGH

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

    Adv. JITENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Krishan PahalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Jai Chandra in a POCSO Act case, finding prima-facie grounds for bail based on inconsistencies in the victim's allegations (escalation from outraging modesty to rape with subsequent silence), a four-day delay in FIR filing without explanation, and the applicant's clean criminal record. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions restricting evidence tampering and witness intimidation, without prejudicing the trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Krishan Pahal

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Krishan PahalView PDF

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/12175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Jai Chandra in a POCSO Act case, finding prima-facie grounds for bail based on inconsistencies in the victim's allegations (escalation from outraging modesty to rape with subsequent silence), a four-day delay in FIR filing without explanation, and the applicant's clean criminal record. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions restricting evidence tampering and witness intimidation, without prejudicing the trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case