SMT. ASHA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA — WRIA/4960/2026

Disposed: -- on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC012000682026

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

WRIA/4960/2026

Registration Date

03-Apr-2026

Judge

Manju Rani Chauhan

Coram

Manju Rani Chauhan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO PRIMARY EDUCATION (TEACHING STAFF) (SINGLE BENCH) ( 15500 )

Sub-Category

Retiring benefits ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ASHA SINGH

    Adv. GRIJESH TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA

  2. 2.U.P. BASIC EDUCATION BOARD

  3. 3.JOINT DIRECTOR (TREASURY AND PENSION)

  4. 4.CHIEF TREASURY OFFICER

  5. 5.DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

  6. 6.FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER IN THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Manju Rani ChauhanView PDF

    Smt. Asha Singh, the first legally wedded wife of deceased Dilip Kumar Singh, challenged the requirement to produce a succession certificate for family pension dues despite an order recognizing her status. The court adjourned the matter to April 20, 2026, granting the respondent's counsel ten days to obtain instructions on the claim that contradictory documents were improperly used in acquiring the succession certificate, which allegedly violates family pension payment rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/4960/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Smt. Asha Singh, the first legally wedded wife of deceased Dilip Kumar Singh, challenged the requirement to produce a succession certificate for family pension dues despite an order recognizing her status. The court adjourned the matter to April 20, 2026, granting the respondent's counsel ten days to obtain instructions on the claim that contradictory documents were improperly used in acquiring the succession certificate, which allegedly violates family pension payment rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case