AMAR SINGH @ AMARJEET SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/2368/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011930722026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLR/2368/2026

Registration Date

03-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Against order issuing summons in case of any nature not provided elsewhere ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAR SINGH @ AMARJEET SINGH

    Adv. NARSINGH PANDEY,RAMA SHANKAR UPADHYAY,RAMA SHANKAR UPADHYAY, ,RAMA SHANKAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.RAMDEEN

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF

    The High Court admitted Amar Singh's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's order summoning him under Section 319 CrPC for an abetment charge in a murder case. The court found the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before summoning the revisionist based solely on witness statements that allegedly introduced new allegations not present in the FIR or investigation. The court issued notice to the State returnable in four weeks and stayed the effect of the trial court's summoning order pending further hearing on 25.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/2368/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court admitted Amar Singh's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's order summoning him under Section 319 CrPC for an abetment charge in a murder case. The court found the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before summoning the revisionist based solely on witness statements that allegedly introduced new allegations not present in the FIR or investigation. The court issued notice to the State returnable in four weeks and stayed the effect of the trial court's summoning order pending further hearing on 25.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case