BRIJESH SINGH YADAV vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY/SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER — ARPL/84/2026
Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011901542026
Filing Number
ARPL/
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
ARPL/84/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 301400 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESH SINGH YADAV
Adv. VIRENDRA SINGH,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA, ,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMPETENT AUTHORITY/SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,PRANJAL MEHROTRA 1123
-
2.MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS
Adv. PRANJAL MEHROTRA
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
Piyush AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal on the Standing Counsel representing respondent no. 1, summoned lower court records, and adjourned the case for listing after receipt of those records. The respondents were permitted to file a counter affidavit in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARPL/84/2026
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal on the Standing Counsel representing respondent no. 1, summoned lower court records, and adjourned the case for listing after receipt of those records. The respondents were permitted to file a counter affidavit in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts