SHAILENDRA SINGH RATHOUR vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY / SPECIAL LALD ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER — ARPL/85/2026

Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Next hearing 06-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011901272026

Filing Number

ARPL/

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

ARPL/85/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 301400 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAILENDRA SINGH RATHOUR

    Adv. VIRENDRA SINGH,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA, ,KAMLESH KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMPETENT AUTHORITY / SPECIAL LALD ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ,PRANJAL MEHROTRA 1123

  2. 2.MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

    Adv. PRANJAL MEHROTRA

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad admitted the appeal filed by Shailendra Singh Rathour under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the Competent Authority/Special Land Acquisition Officer. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal on the Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1, summoned lower court records, and listed the matter for hearing after receipt of those records, with respondents permitted to file counter affidavits in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARPL/85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad admitted the appeal filed by Shailendra Singh Rathour under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the Competent Authority/Special Land Acquisition Officer. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal on the Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1, summoned lower court records, and listed the matter for hearing after receipt of those records, with respondents permitted to file counter affidavits in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case