ASHA RAM AND OTHERS AMIT SAXENA, ARCHANA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. URBAN AND OTHERS — WRIC/51962/2008
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011900762008
Filing Number
WRIC/51962/2008
Filing Date
27-Sep-2008
Registration No
WRIC/51962/2008
Registration Date
27-Sep-2008
Judge
Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan
Coram
Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
U.P. URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1973 ( 340600 )
Sub-Category
Nazul land ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHA RAM AND OTHERS AMIT SAXENA, ARCHANA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. URBAN AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Siddharth Nandan,atul SreedharanView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition (WRIC 51962/2008) filed by Asha Ram and others against the State of U.P. for want of prosecution because the petitioners failed to appear even at the revised hearing. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to file a restoration application within one month if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Vivek Saran
-
04-Jan-2019
For Admission
Manoj Misra , Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
-
19-Dec-2018
For Admission
B.amit Sthalekar , Piyush Agrawal
-
12-Dec-2018
For Admission
B.amit Sthalekar , Piyush Agrawal
-
03-Dec-2018
For Admission
B.amit Sthalekar , Piyush Agrawal
-
26-Nov-2018
B.amit Sthalekar,piyush AgrawalView PDF
-
26-Nov-2018
For Admission
Pritinker Diwaker , Saral Srivastava
-
16-Nov-2018
Pritinker Diwaker,saral SrivastavaView PDF
-
01-Nov-2015
—
Ram Surat Ram (Maurya) , R.K. Agrawal
-
29-Sep-2008
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/51962/2008
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition (WRIC 51962/2008) filed by Asha Ram and others against the State of U.P. for want of prosecution because the petitioners failed to appear even at the revised hearing. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to file a restoration application within one month if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts