BHARAT SINGH @ RAMHARAKH SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — A227/4475/2026

Disposed: -- on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011877622026

Filing Number

A227/

Filing Date

28-Mar-2026

Registration No

A227/4475/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Vikram D Chauhan

Coram

Vikram D Chauhan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India ( 185100 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Writs arising out of State Cases (except complaint cases) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SINGH @ RAMHARAKH SINGH

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR RAI,SURENDRA KUMAR CHAUBEY,SURENDRA KUMAR CHAUBEY, ,SURENDRA KUMAR CHAUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.PESHKAR (CHANDILAL), ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Vikram D ChauhanView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed Bharat Singh's petition challenging rejection of his Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. application against Peshkar Chandilal's alleged harassment and improper fee demands. The court upheld both the trial and revisional courts' orders, finding the dispute pertained to court proceedings and involved no legal error. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to raise his grievance directly before the concerned Presiding Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    As Fresh

    Vikram D Chauhan

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    As Fresh

    Vikram D Chauhan

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Vikram D ChauhanView PDF

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Vikram D ChauhanView PDF

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A227/4475/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed Bharat Singh's petition challenging rejection of his Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. application against Peshkar Chandilal's alleged harassment and improper fee demands. The court upheld both the trial and revisional courts' orders, finding the dispute pertained to court proceedings and involved no legal error. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to raise his grievance directly before the concerned Presiding Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case