GAURAV SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AKHIL TIWARI,KUMAR ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA — NA528/13328/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 419,43-419. Disposed: -- on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011856912026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

28-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/13328/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Saurabh Srivastava

Coram

Saurabh Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 419,43-419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAURAV SINGH

    Adv. VIJAY VIKRAM SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AKHIL TIWARI,KUMAR ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.RAKESH KUMAR

    Adv. KUMAR ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA AKHIL TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad issued notice to the second opposite party through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, with service to be completed within seven days. The court consolidated the application with two related cases (11045 and 11102 of 2026) and directed the AGA to obtain complete instructions, while the Registrar was instructed to ensure timely compliance and service of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/13328/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad issued notice to the second opposite party through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, with service to be completed within seven days. The court consolidated the application with two related cases (11045 and 11102 of 2026) and directed the AGA to obtain complete instructions, while the Registrar was instructed to ensure timely compliance and service of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case