TITU @ ATUL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHARMA — NA528/13237/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 366,43-366. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC011845432026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/13237/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 366,43-366

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TITU @ ATUL

    Adv. MUKESH JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

  2. 2.FIRST INFORMANT

    Adv. JAINENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

    Adv. JAINENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

    Adv. JAINENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Allahabad granted a stay on proceedings in a POCSO Act case involving applicant Titu @ Atul, who sought to quash criminal proceedings arising from a 2021 FIR involving charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 354 and POCSO Act sections 7/8. Both parties submitted a certified compromise settlement, and the court directed them to appear before the trial court within six weeks for verification. The case was adjourned to 20.7.2026 with further proceedings against the applicant stayed pending verification of the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/13237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Allahabad granted a stay on proceedings in a POCSO Act case involving applicant Titu @ Atul, who sought to quash criminal proceedings arising from a 2021 FIR involving charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 354 and POCSO Act sections 7/8. Both parties submitted a certified compromise settlement, and the court directed them to appear before the trial court within six weeks for verification. The case was adjourned to 20.7.2026 with further proceedings against the applicant stayed pending verification of the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case