SHIVANAND MALL RAGHVENDRA TRIPATHI, AKHILESH K. DWIVEDI vs DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION MAU AND 10 OTHERS — WRIB/3110/2015
Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011842212015
Filing Number
WRIB/3110/2015
Filing Date
21-Jan-2015
Registration No
WRIB/3110/2015
Registration Date
21-Jan-2015
Judge
Manjive Shukla
Coram
Manjive Shukla
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVANAND MALL RAGHVENDRA TRIPATHI, AKHILESH K. DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION MAU AND 10 OTHERS
Adv. SRI PRAKASH SRIVASTVA 1123
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
27-Feb-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
09-Feb-2026
Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF
In WRIB/3110/2015 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the court heard petitioner Shivanand Mall against the Dy. Director of Consolidation Mau and 10 others. By order dated February 9, 2026, the court adjourned the matter for the next hearing on February 27, 2026, as prayed by the parties. No substantive order on merits was passed in this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
For Final Disposal
Kshitij Shailendra
-
20-Jan-2026
Kshitij ShailendraView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
02-Jun-2025
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
12-May-2025
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
22-Apr-2025
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
17-Dec-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
05-Dec-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
26-Jul-2024
—
Dinesh Pathak
-
05-Jun-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
15-May-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
06-May-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
29-Apr-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
23-Apr-2024
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
01-Mar-2024
—
Dinesh Pathak
-
23-Feb-2024
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
16-Feb-2024
—
Dinesh Pathak
-
03-Nov-2023
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
25-Jul-2023
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
01-May-2023
For Admission
S. Q. H. Rizvi
-
24-Apr-2023
For Admission
S. Q. H. Rizvi
-
04-Apr-2023
S. Q. H. RizviView PDF
-
15-Mar-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
15-Mar-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
01-Mar-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
22-Feb-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
15-Feb-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
08-Feb-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
30-Jan-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
19-Jan-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
12-Jan-2023
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
15-Dec-2022
For Admission
Siddharth
-
08-Dec-2022
For Admission
Siddharth
-
02-Dec-2022
For Admission
Siddharth
-
25-Nov-2022
For Admission
Siddharth
-
21-Nov-2022
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
12-Oct-2022
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
28-Sep-2022
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
28-Sep-2022
For Admission
Dinesh Pathak
-
07-Mar-2022
For Admission
Prakash Padia
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
14-Feb-2022
For Order
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
09-Apr-2020
For Order
Prakash Padia
-
17-Mar-2020
Prakash PadiaView PDF
-
17-Mar-2020
For Order
Rajiv Joshi
-
06-May-2019
Rajiv JoshiView PDF
-
30-Oct-2018
For Admission
Anjani Kumar Mishra
-
25-Jan-2018
For Admission
Sunita Agarwal
-
15-Jan-2018
For Order
No Tied Up
-
23-Jan-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2015
Case filed
Registration No. WRIB/3110/2015
In WRIB/3110/2015 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the court heard petitioner Shivanand Mall against the Dy. Director of Consolidation Mau and 10 others. By order dated February 9, 2026, the court adjourned the matter for the next hearing on February 27, 2026, as prayed by the parties. No substantive order on merits was passed in this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts