SANDEEP vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/13194/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CNR: UPHC011839182026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/13194/2026
Registration Date
28-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP
Adv. AKASH PUNDIR,SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, ,SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SMT SONI
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jul-2026
—
Nand Prabha Shukla
-
08-Apr-2026
Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/13194/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred Sandeep's petition (seeking to quash dowry and assault charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 506, and Dowry Prohibition Act) to the High Court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre for amicable settlement. Sandeep was directed to deposit ₹25,000 within four weeks (₹20,000 as legal expenses to the opposite party, ₹5,000 to the Centre). The case is adjourned to 16.07.2026, and no coercive action will be taken against the applicant pending mediation; the interim protection lapses if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/13194/2026
Case Summary: NA528/13194/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred Sandeep's petition (seeking to quash dowry and assault charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 506, and Dowry Prohibition Act) to the High Court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre for amicable settlement. Sandeep was directed to deposit ₹25,000 within four weeks (₹20,000 as legal expenses to the opposite party, ₹5,000 to the Centre). The case is adjourned to 16.07.2026, and no coercive action will be taken against the applicant pending mediation; the interim protection lapses if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts