SURAJ GUPTA vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/10486/2026
Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011733332026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
BAIL/10486/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ GUPTA
Adv. ZAFAR ABBAS,SARVE NAZIR,SARVE NAZIR, ,SARVE NAZIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
Summary of BAIL 10486/2026 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Suraj Gupta in his second bail application, which was previously rejected on 23.04.2025. The court found the application fit for bail based on parity grounds, noting that a similarly situated co-accused (Kumari Devi) had already been granted bail by the same court. Gupta was released on bail for Case Crime No. 04 of 2025 under BNS Sections 296(b), 115(2), 109, 351(3), and 352, with conditions including furnishing personal bond, two local sureties, and obligations not to tamper with evidence, threaten witnesses, or induce case-related persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
06-Apr-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/10486/2026
Summary of BAIL 10486/2026 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Suraj Gupta in his second bail application, which was previously rejected on 23.04.2025. The court found the application fit for bail based on parity grounds, noting that a similarly situated co-accused (Kumari Devi) had already been granted bail by the same court. Gupta was released on bail for Case Crime No. 04 of 2025 under BNS Sections 296(b), 115(2), 109, 351(3), and 352, with conditions including furnishing personal bond, two local sureties, and obligations not to tamper with evidence, threaten witnesses, or induce case-related persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts