VIKAS THAKUR @ VIKAS SINGH vs STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., SHUBHAM OJHA — NA528/12356/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 427,43-427. Disposed: -- on 11th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011716972026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/12356/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Saurabh Srivastava
Coram
Saurabh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKAS THAKUR @ VIKAS SINGH
Adv. SURAJ TIWARI,SHIKHER TRIVEDI,SHIKHER TRIVEDI, ,SHIKHER TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., SHUBHAM OJHA
-
2.SRI RAMANAND
Adv. SHUBHAM OJHA
-
3.SMT KIRAN
Adv. SHUBHAM OJHA
-
4.JYOTI
Adv. SHUBHAM OJHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
28-Mar-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court set aside the lower court's rejection of a compromise between parties and quashed criminal proceedings against Vikas Thakur under IPC Sections 452, 323, 506, 427, and 336 (arising from 2022 crime case). Though offenses under Sections 336 and 452 are non-compoundable, the court exercised inherent powers to quash proceedings based on amicable settlement, finding continuation futile where both parties willingly compromised and no serious societal impact existed. The lower court must verify the compromise within four weeks of receiving the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/12356/2026
The Allahabad High Court set aside the lower court's rejection of a compromise between parties and quashed criminal proceedings against Vikas Thakur under IPC Sections 452, 323, 506, 427, and 336 (arising from 2022 crime case). Though offenses under Sections 336 and 452 are non-compoundable, the court exercised inherent powers to quash proceedings based on amicable settlement, finding continuation futile where both parties willingly compromised and no serious societal impact existed. The lower court must verify the compromise within four weeks of receiving the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts