YASHPAL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — CRLA/7989/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(3),506. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011701352023
Filing Number
CRLA/101287/2023
Filing Date
01-Aug-2023
Registration No
CRLA/7989/2023
Registration Date
05-Aug-2023
Judge
Raj Beer Singh
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter where offence U/s 376 I.P.C. with or without POSCO act is involved (SB) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YASHPAL
Adv. PANKAJ BHARTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
-
2.FIRST INFORMANT
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
-
4.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Case History
-
18-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
16-Apr-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
18-Feb-2026
Manoj BajajView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 7989/2023, the Allahabad High Court adjourned the case to April 8, 2026. Opposite party no. 2 could not be served as she is not residing at the given address. The State was directed to locate and serve opposite party no. 2, and the State Counsel was granted time to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jan-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
05-Dec-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
28-Oct-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
19-Sep-2025
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Aug-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
27-May-2025
—
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
16-Apr-2025
—
Rajeev Misra
-
14-Feb-2025
—
Rajeev Singh
-
05-Nov-2024
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
28-Aug-2024
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
05-Oct-2023
For Order
Raj Beer Singh
-
26-Sep-2023
For Order
Raj Beer Singh
-
10-Aug-2023
Raj Beer SinghView PDF
-
10-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/7989/2023
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 7989/2023, the Allahabad High Court adjourned the case to April 8, 2026. Opposite party no. 2 could not be served as she is not residing at the given address. The State was directed to locate and serve opposite party no. 2, and the State Counsel was granted time to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts