VIDHI CHAND CHAUHAN AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/12387/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011695172026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/12387/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIDHI CHAND CHAUHAN AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. AMARJEET YADAV
-
2.PREM CHAND CHAUHAN
-
3.AKASH CHAUHAN
-
4.BANDANA DEVI
-
5.PREMSHEELA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SHIVADHAR CHAUHAN
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
For Order
Padam Narain Mishra
-
10-Apr-2026
Padam Narain MishraView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/12387/2026 The High Court at Allahabad admitted an application u/s 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 18678/2023) against the applicants under IPC Sections 147, 323, and 504. The Court found prima facie merit in the applicants' allegations that the complaint was filed frivolously with ulterior motive to harass them. The Court issued notice to respondent no. 2, directed both parties to file counter and rejoinder affidavits within specified timelines, and crucially, imposed interim protection by restraining any coercive action against the applicants until the next hearing in six weeks. The case was adjourned for substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
03-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/12387/2026
Case Summary: NA528/12387/2026 The High Court at Allahabad admitted an application u/s 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 18678/2023) against the applicants under IPC Sections 147, 323, and 504. The Court found prima facie merit in the applicants' allegations that the complaint was filed frivolously with ulterior motive to harass them. The Court issued notice to respondent no. 2, directed both parties to file counter and rejoinder affidavits within specified timelines, and crucially, imposed interim protection by restraining any coercive action against the applicants until the next hearing in six weeks. The case was adjourned for substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts