SHYAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAJESH KUMAR NISHAD,DIGVIJAY SINGH — CRLA/3182/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va). Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011683162026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLA/3182/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va)
Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI

    Adv. RAM RAKSHA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAJESH KUMAR NISHAD,DIGVIJAY SINGH

  2. 2.HARILAL

    Adv. DIGVIJAY SINGH RAJESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  3. 18-May-2026

    Tej Pratap Tiwari

  4. 11-May-2026

    Tej Pratap Tiwari

  5. 04-May-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    In Criminal Appeal No. 3182 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued notice to the opposite party (respondent no. 2) through the Chief Judicial Magistrate and adjourned the case for hearing after two weeks. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/3182/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 3182 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued notice to the opposite party (respondent no. 2) through the Chief Judicial Magistrate and adjourned the case for hearing after two weeks. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case