DUDHNATH AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,REENIKA GUPTA,MANVENDRA KUMAR YADAV,NABI ULLAH,MEERA — NABAIL/2935/2026
Disposed: -- on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011655822026
Filing Number
NABAIL/
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
NABAIL/2935/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Coram
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DUDHNATH AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. VIJAY PRAKASH CHATURVEDI,KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI,KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI, ,KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI
-
2.RAKESH
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI
-
3.HARISHCHANDRA
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,REENIKA GUPTA,MANVENDRA KUMAR YADAV,NABI ULLAH,MEERA
-
2.RAMSHANKAR
Adv. MEERA NABI ULLAH MANVENDRA KUMAR YADAV REENIKA GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
-
16-Apr-2026
—
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to applicants Dudhnath, Rakesh, and Harishchandra in a case under Section 108 of the BNS, valid until 08.04.2026, pending the Government Advocate's receipt of instructions. The bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NABAIL/2935/2026
The Allahabad High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to applicants Dudhnath, Rakesh, and Harishchandra in a case under Section 108 of the BNS, valid until 08.04.2026, pending the Government Advocate's receipt of instructions. The bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts