MAYANK @ MULU vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER — CRLA/3026/2026

Case under Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 25,4-25. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC011613222026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLA/3026/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 25,4-25
Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAYANK @ MULU

    Adv. NEHA TYAGI,AKASH TYAGI,AKASH TYAGI, ,AKASH TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ,VIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY 1123

  2. 2.SMT. BABITA

    Adv. VIJAY KUMAR

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    —

    Samit Gopal

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Samit GopalView PDF

    In Criminal Appeal No. 3026 of 2026, the High Court of Allahabad (Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J.) adjourned the matter for one month upon the appellant's request. The case has been listed for hearing on 13.7.2026. The court noted that counsel for opposite party no. 2 was absent and directed the office to trace the vakalatnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/3026/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 3026 of 2026, the High Court of Allahabad (Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J.) adjourned the matter for one month upon the appellant's request. The case has been listed for hearing on 13.7.2026. The court noted that counsel for opposite party no. 2 was absent and directed the office to trace the vakalatnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case