KUSHAL KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — CRLP/6228/2026
Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011611972026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/6228/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUSHAL KUMAR GUPTA
Adv. GYANENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH,G.A. 1123
-
2.POLICE COMMISSIONER, AGRA COMMISSIONERATE
Adv. G.A. HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTWALI
Adv. G.A. HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH
-
4.KUSHAL GUPTA
Adv. G.A. HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
—
Ajay Kumar-II , Rajiv Gupta
-
24-Mar-2026
Ajay Kumar-Ii,rajiv GuptaView PDF
Summary of CRLP 6228/2026 Kushal Kumar Gupta filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 19.02.2026 (Case Crime No. 0016 of 2026) under Sections 316(2) and 351(2) of BNS, Police Station Kotwali, Agra, arguing the allegations disclose no offence against him. The High Court adjourned the petition to 25.05.2026, granting respondent no. 4 and the state three weeks to file counter affidavits. Pending consideration, the court directed that any arrest must strictly comply with Section 35 of BNSS and Supreme Court guidelines in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* and *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/6228/2026
Summary of CRLP 6228/2026 Kushal Kumar Gupta filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 19.02.2026 (Case Crime No. 0016 of 2026) under Sections 316(2) and 351(2) of BNS, Police Station Kotwali, Agra, arguing the allegations disclose no offence against him. The High Court adjourned the petition to 25.05.2026, granting respondent no. 4 and the state three weeks to file counter affidavits. Pending consideration, the court directed that any arrest must strictly comply with Section 35 of BNSS and Supreme Court guidelines in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* and *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts