TINKU vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — CRLP/6149/2026

Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jun-2026

CNR: UPHC011592782026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/6149/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TINKU

    Adv. SURYA BHAN YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. RISHI KESH MALVIYA,G.A. 1123

  2. 2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A. RISHI KESH MALVIYA

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION BAHAFURGARH

    Adv. G.A. RISHI KESH MALVIYA

  4. 4.JITENDRA

    Adv. G.A. RISHI KESH MALVIYA

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    —

    Ajay Kumar-II , Rajiv Gupta

  3. 22-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Ajay Kumar-Ii,rajiv GuptaView PDF

    Summary of CRLP No. 6149/2026: Petitioner Tinku filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25.02.2026 (Case Crime No.37 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), and 352 of BNS at Police Station Bahadurgarh. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the matter to 22.05.2026 for consideration, directing notice to newly impleaded injured parties. In the interim, the court mandated strict compliance with Section 35 of BNSS and Arnesh Kumar/Satender Kumar Antil guidelines before any arrest of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/6149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLP No. 6149/2026: Petitioner Tinku filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25.02.2026 (Case Crime No.37 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), and 352 of BNS at Police Station Bahadurgarh. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the matter to 22.05.2026 for consideration, directing notice to newly impleaded injured parties. In the interim, the court mandated strict compliance with Section 35 of BNSS and Arnesh Kumar/Satender Kumar Antil guidelines before any arrest of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case