ASHIM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,VIVEK UPADHYAY,DEWENDRA SINGH — CRLRD/619/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011582622026
Filing Number
CRLRD/
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLRD/619/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Against order framing charge ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHIM
Adv. ATUL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,VIVEK UPADHYAY,DEWENDRA SINGH
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. DEWENDRA SINGH VIVEK UPADHYAY
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. DEWENDRA SINGH VIVEK UPADHYAY
-
4.INFORMANT
Adv. DEWENDRA SINGH VIVEK UPADHYAY
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
21-May-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
14-May-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
07-May-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
30-Apr-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Revision Defective No. 619/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Justice Subhash Chandra Sharma) issued notice to opposite party nos. 3 and 4 through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, returnable within four weeks. The case was adjourned and listed for fresh hearing on 23.04.2026 on the point of delay, with the learned Additional Government Advocate directed to ensure service of notice on the opposite party/informant in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLRD/619/2026
Case Summary: In Criminal Revision Defective No. 619/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Justice Subhash Chandra Sharma) issued notice to opposite party nos. 3 and 4 through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, returnable within four weeks. The case was adjourned and listed for fresh hearing on 23.04.2026 on the point of delay, with the learned Additional Government Advocate directed to ensure service of notice on the opposite party/informant in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts