SMT. RAFIYA KHATOON vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS — WRIA/5005/2026
Disposed: -- on 07th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011574352026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIA/5005/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Coram
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO OTHER SERVICE MATTERS NOT COVERED UNDER AFORESAID HEADS ( 19900 )
Sub-Category
Salary and allowances ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. RAFIYA KHATOON
Adv. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,DINESH KUMAR MISRA 1123
-
2.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD
Adv. DINESH KUMAR MISRA A.S.G.I. C.S.C.
-
3.SPECIAL SECRETARY, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND WEIGHTS AND MEASURERS, ANUBHAG-2, SECRETARIAT GOVERNMENT
Adv. DINESH KUMAR MISRA A.S.G.I. C.S.C.
-
4.PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Adv. DINESH KUMAR MISRA A.S.G.I. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Garima Prashad , Saral Srivastava
-
26-Mar-2026
Garima Prashad,saral SrivastavaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court disposed of Smt. Rafiya Khatoon's writ petition seeking mandamus for salary as a Woman Member of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Lalitpur, rejecting the petitioner's counsel's request to decide without examining merits. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent directly and permitted reconsideration only if she establishes her entitlement to salary on both factual and legal grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/5005/2026
The Allahabad High Court disposed of Smt. Rafiya Khatoon's writ petition seeking mandamus for salary as a Woman Member of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Lalitpur, rejecting the petitioner's counsel's request to decide without examining merits. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent directly and permitted reconsideration only if she establishes her entitlement to salary on both factual and legal grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts