ARUN KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/11519/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011571932026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/11519/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Nand Prabha Shukla

Coram

Nand Prabha Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR

    Adv. DILEEP KUMAR,ANOOP KUMAR,ANOOP KUMAR, ,ANOOP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. NEHA MATHUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed Arun Kumar's application to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 DP Act, finding prima facie offences were made out against him. The court held that disputed factual questions cannot be adjudicated under Section 528 BNSS and no judicial misuse was established. However, the court directed expedited consideration of any bail application filed within 30 days and imposed a 30-day stay on coercive measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/11519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed Arun Kumar's application to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 DP Act, finding prima facie offences were made out against him. The court held that disputed factual questions cannot be adjudicated under Section 528 BNSS and no judicial misuse was established. However, the court directed expedited consideration of any bail application filed within 30 days and imposed a 30-day stay on coercive measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case