QAMAR ANWAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/10972/2026

Disposed: -- on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011569262026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10972/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Vinod Diwakar

Coram

Vinod Diwakar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS (EXCEPT ORDERS OF CIVIL COURT AND TAX MATTERS) ( 181000 )

Sub-Category

ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.QAMAR ANWAR

    Adv. MERAJ AHMAD KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C.,KRISHNA MOHAN ASTHANA 1123

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER, MORADABAD MANDAL

    Adv. KRISHNA MOHAN ASTHANA C.S.C.

  3. 3.VICE CHANCELLOR MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. KRISHNA MOHAN ASTHANA C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Vinod DiwakarView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Qamar Anwar challenging a demolition order dated 10.02.2026 by the Moradabad Development Authority, finding that his building map sanction application remained pending. The court granted liberty to file a fresh application for map sanction, directing expeditious consideration in accordance with law, effectively providing the petitioner an opportunity to obtain proper authorization before any demolition action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Vinod DiwakarView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10972/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the writ petition filed by Qamar Anwar challenging a demolition order dated 10.02.2026 by the Moradabad Development Authority, finding that his building map sanction application remained pending. The court granted liberty to file a fresh application for map sanction, directing expeditious consideration in accordance with law, effectively providing the petitioner an opportunity to obtain proper authorization before any demolition action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case