ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,UMESH KUMAR PAL,R.B.PAL — BAIL/9667/2026

Case under Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 30,4-30. Disposed: -- on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011554422026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

BAIL/9667/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 30,4-30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

    Adv. NAUSHEEN FATIMA,FARHAN KHAN,FARHAN KHAN, ,FARHAN KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,UMESH KUMAR PAL,R.B.PAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The Allahabad High Court in bail application No. 9667/2026 heard arguments from counsel for applicant Ashok Kumar Pandey and the state's counsel, but counsel for the first informant were absent. The court adjourned the case to 9.4.2026, listing it in the top 20 cases for fresh hearing, and clarified that proceedings will continue in the first informant's absence if they remain unrepresented on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/9667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court in bail application No. 9667/2026 heard arguments from counsel for applicant Ashok Kumar Pandey and the state's counsel, but counsel for the first informant were absent. The court adjourned the case to 9.4.2026, listing it in the top 20 cases for fresh hearing, and clarified that proceedings will continue in the first informant's absence if they remain unrepresented on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case