RAJESH PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/2394/2026

Disposed: -- on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011547212026

Filing Number

CRLRD/

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLR/2394/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Manoj Bajaj

Coram

Manoj Bajaj

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Revision against dismissal of Application for discharge Under any section of Code of Criminal Procedure ( 34 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH PANDEY

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.AMIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    —

    Manoj Bajaj

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Manoj Bajaj

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rajesh Pandey's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a Gangsters Act case. The court found that the District Magistrate's approval was properly granted after careful examination of the gang chart and supporting materials, rejecting Pandey's argument that the approval was non-speaking or mechanical. Charges against Pandey involving four cases (three NDPS Act and one IPC Section 420) were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/2394/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rajesh Pandey's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a Gangsters Act case. The court found that the District Magistrate's approval was properly granted after careful examination of the gang chart and supporting materials, rejecting Pandey's argument that the approval was non-speaking or mechanical. Charges against Pandey involving four cases (three NDPS Act and one IPC Section 420) were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case