SHIV SHAMBHU KAPOOR vs UNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION, NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - PRATIK CHANDRA, ,ANANT VIJAY — WRIA/3920/2026
Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011546222026
Filing Number
WRIA/
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIA/3920/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO UNIVERSITY (TEACHING STAFF) (SINGLE BENCH) ( 16900 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIV SHAMBHU KAPOOR
Adv. FAYA NATH DUBEY,BANSH RAJ MISHRA,BANSH RAJ MISHRA, ,BANSH RAJ MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION, NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - PRATIK CHANDRA, ,ANANT VIJAY
-
2.DAYAL BAGH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
Adv. ANANT VIJAY
-
3.REGISTRAR, DAYAL BAGH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
Adv. ANANT VIJAY
-
4.MRS. ARCHA SRIVASTAVA TABLA ACCOMPANIST DAYAL BAGH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
Adv. ANANT VIJAY
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
13-May-2026
Saurabh Shyam ShamsheryView PDF
Case Summary: WRIA 3920/2026 The High Court of Allahabad granted the University Grant Commission's request for two weeks' additional time to file a counter affidavit, despite having previously ordered its filing on March 23, 2026. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, and adjourned the matter for listing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Dinesh PathakView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/3920/2026
Case Summary: WRIA 3920/2026 The High Court of Allahabad granted the University Grant Commission's request for two weeks' additional time to file a counter affidavit, despite having previously ordered its filing on March 23, 2026. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, and adjourned the matter for listing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts