ANKIT vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/9572/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011534872026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

BAIL/9572/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Krishan Pahal

Coram

Krishan Pahal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT

    Adv. RAJEEV MALVIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.INFORMANT

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

  4. 4.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Krishan PahalView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Ankit in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. The court found that the victim's statement indicated her consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to several places and married him, and noted she stated being 18 years old with no medical evidence corroborating the alleged incident. Ankit was released on bail with personal bond, two sureties, and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/9572/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Ankit in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. The court found that the victim's statement indicated her consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to several places and married him, and noted she stated being 18 years old with no medical evidence corroborating the alleged incident. Ankit was released on bail with personal bond, two sureties, and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case