AJAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - ANJALI UPADHYA — WRIC/10403/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011514202026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10403/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Coram

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( 340700 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

    Adv. GANGA DHAR SHUKLA

  2. 2.BHANWAR SINGH

  3. 3.VEER SINGH

  4. 4.SMT. RAMAVATI

  5. 5.NEMVEER

  6. 6.HARISH CHAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - ANJALI UPADHYA

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL SADAR

  4. 4.GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  5. 5.SENIOR MANAGER (WORK CIRCLE-

  6. 6.GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,kunal Ravi SinghView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition without quashing the demolition notice issued to petitioners for unauthorized construction in Greater Noida Authority's jurisdiction. The court found the writ petition premature since proceedings were incomplete, but directed petitioners to file detailed objections to the notice within 10 days, which the Authority must decide within 6 weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10403/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition without quashing the demolition notice issued to petitioners for unauthorized construction in Greater Noida Authority's jurisdiction. The court found the writ petition premature since proceedings were incomplete, but directed petitioners to file detailed objections to the notice within 10 days, which the Authority must decide within 6 weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case