YASH PATHAK vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,PANKAJ KUMAR — CRLA/2861/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011514062026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLA/2861/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Madan Pal Singh

Coram

Madan Pal Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506
Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YASH PATHAK

    Adv. MRITYUNJAY DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,PANKAJ KUMAR

  2. 2.PINTU

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR

  3. 3.RAJA

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad allowed Yash Pathak's criminal appeal and quashed all proceedings against him under SC/ST Act sections after the parties reached a verified compromise. The court found the case involved a private dispute with minor offences, the compromise was voluntary and free from coercion, and permitting settlement would not undermine the Act's protective objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2861/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad allowed Yash Pathak's criminal appeal and quashed all proceedings against him under SC/ST Act sections after the parties reached a verified compromise. The court found the case involved a private dispute with minor offences, the compromise was voluntary and free from coercion, and permitting settlement would not undermine the Act's protective objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case