JAVED GAFFAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR — NABAIL/2733/2026

Disposed: -- on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011513022026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2733/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAVED GAFFAR

    Adv. ASHISH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR

  2. 2.SAHAR KHAN

    Adv. SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted interim anticipatory bail to Javed Gaffar in a case involving alleged offenses under Sections 87, 64, and 351(2) of the BNS at Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun. The applicant, who is the brother-in-law of the informant and had previously received interim protection, was enlarged on bail until April 2, 2026, subject to furnishing personal bond and two sureties, with conditions requiring his availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2733/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted interim anticipatory bail to Javed Gaffar in a case involving alleged offenses under Sections 87, 64, and 351(2) of the BNS at Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun. The applicant, who is the brother-in-law of the informant and had previously received interim protection, was enlarged on bail until April 2, 2026, subject to furnishing personal bond and two sureties, with conditions requiring his availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case