BALKRISHNA SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,VIVEK SINGH — CRLR/1903/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011512762026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLR/1903/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALKRISHNA SHARMA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. DR. AKHILESH KUMAR,RAWATI RAMAN PATHAK,RAWATI RAMAN PATHAK, ,RAWATI RAMAN PATHAK

  2. 2.JAIDEV SHARMA

    Adv. RAWATI RAMAN PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,VIVEK SINGH

  2. 2.DWARIKA PRASAD SHARMA

    Adv. VIVEK SINGH

Case History

  1. 11-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    —

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla

  3. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    Summary of CRLR No. 1903 of 2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad partly allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Balkrishna Sharma (aged 80) and Jaidev Sharma against dismissal of their discharge application in a case under Sections 452, 504, 506 IPC. The Court stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case, noting that a related civil suit concerning temple management is pending and both accused reside on the same premises, making the Section 452 IPC charge questionable. The matter is listed for hearing after five weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/1903/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLR No. 1903 of 2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad partly allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Balkrishna Sharma (aged 80) and Jaidev Sharma against dismissal of their discharge application in a case under Sections 452, 504, 506 IPC. The Court stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case, noting that a related civil suit concerning temple management is pending and both accused reside on the same premises, making the Section 452 IPC charge questionable. The matter is listed for hearing after five weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case