ANKIT vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/11046/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 363,43-363. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011510162026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/11046/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 363,43-363

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT

    Adv. RAVI SHANKAR TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.NAZMA

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 08-May-2026

    Chawan PrakashView PDF

    Case Summary: Applicant Ankit filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash proceedings in a kidnapping case (Section 363 I.P.C.) where he alleged he was falsely implicated despite not being named in the FIR. The victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. contained no allegations against him. The High Court adjourned the matter to July 10, 2026, granted a stay of further proceedings against the applicant until the next hearing, and directed both parties to file affidavits for consideration by an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  5. 01-May-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Padam Narain Mishra

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Samit Gopal

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 26-Mar-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/11046/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Applicant Ankit filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash proceedings in a kidnapping case (Section 363 I.P.C.) where he alleged he was falsely implicated despite not being named in the FIR. The victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. contained no allegations against him. The High Court adjourned the matter to July 10, 2026, granted a stay of further proceedings against the applicant until the next hearing, and directed both parties to file affidavits for consideration by an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case