VIKAS ARORA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/10999/2026

Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011503912026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/10999/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Deepak Verma

Coram

Deepak Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/S 482 Cr.P.C. against order of Magistrate under section 138 of negotiable instruments Act 1881 ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS ARORA

    Adv. GAURAV PUNDIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.R.K. FIRM BUILDERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR ROHIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Deepak VermaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court disposed of Vikas Arora's petition seeking to quash cheque bounce proceedings under Section 138 NI Act by directing him to file a compounding application within one month and deposit 10% of the cheque amount. The court granted a four-month window for settlement negotiations, after which the trial court must decide within five months whether to allow compromise or proceed to trial, with no coercive action against the accused during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/10999/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court disposed of Vikas Arora's petition seeking to quash cheque bounce proceedings under Section 138 NI Act by directing him to file a compounding application within one month and deposit 10% of the cheque amount. The court granted a four-month window for settlement negotiations, after which the trial court must decide within five months whether to allow compromise or proceed to trial, with no coercive action against the accused during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case