SMT. SAVITRI DEVI vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS — WRIC/10385/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011500102026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10385/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava

Coram

Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ( 222900 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SAVITRI DEVI

    Adv. VARUN KUMAR CHAUBEY,ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAY,ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAY, ,ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C.,RISHU MISHRA 1123

  2. 2.PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED, VARANASI THROUGH ITS

    Adv. RISHU MISHRA C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. RISHU MISHRA C.S.C.

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION

    Adv. RISHU MISHRA C.S.C.

  5. 5.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SEWRAHI

    Adv. RISHU MISHRA C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF

    The High Court disposed of Savitri Devi's petition without deciding the merits, directing her to file a fresh representation within one month before the Executive Engineer regarding removal of electricity cables from her property in Kushinagar. The respondent authority was ordered to consider and decide the representation within one month of receipt, in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of Savitri Devi's petition without deciding the merits, directing her to file a fresh representation within one month before the Executive Engineer regarding removal of electricity cables from her property in Kushinagar. The respondent authority was ordered to consider and decide the representation within one month of receipt, in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case