SARVESH KUMAR DUBEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR PATHAK,ASHISH KUMAR OJHA — NA528/10838/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 125(3),10-125(3). Disposed: -- on 14th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011498892026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/10838/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARVESH KUMAR DUBEY
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR PATHAK,ASHISH KUMAR OJHA
-
2.SADHANA DUBEY
Adv. ASHISH KUMAR OJHA AJAY KUMAR PATHAK
-
3.PRADHUMAN @ SHIBU
Adv. ASHISH KUMAR OJHA AJAY KUMAR PATHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
07-May-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
30-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court admitted Sarvesh Kumar Dubey's application seeking to quash recovery warrant orders dated 13.02.2026 and 20.02.2026 issued by the Family Court in a maintenance case under Section 125 CrPC. The court issued notice to opposite parties, sought clarification on proper warrant issuance procedures, granted interim protection by prohibiting coercive measures against the applicant, and adjourned the matter to 16.4.2026 for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/10838/2026
The Allahabad High Court admitted Sarvesh Kumar Dubey's application seeking to quash recovery warrant orders dated 13.02.2026 and 20.02.2026 issued by the Family Court in a maintenance case under Section 125 CrPC. The court issued notice to opposite parties, sought clarification on proper warrant issuance procedures, granted interim protection by prohibiting coercive measures against the applicant, and adjourned the matter to 16.4.2026 for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts