ANURAG AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MANIK CHANDRA YADAV — NA528/10835/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC011492942026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/10835/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Saurabh Srivastava

Coram

Saurabh Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous under the Head of Crl. Misc. Applications ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANURAG AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. VARUN KUMAR CHAUBEY,NAGENDRA YADAV,NAGENDRA YADAV, ,NAGENDRA YADAV

  2. 2.SANJAY MAURYA

    Adv. NAGENDRA YADAV

  3. 3.ANKUSH

    Adv. NAGENDRA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MANIK CHANDRA YADAV

  2. 2.SARIKA MAURYA

    Adv. MANIK CHANDRA YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court allowed the applicants' petition to correct procedural defects in their application. The court found that the informant (Sarika Maurya) had retracted her allegations in her Section 161 Cr.P.C. statement, claiming she no longer wished to pursue the matter, and that incident dates did not corroborate the FIR. The court directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh to ensure the informant's personal appearance on the next hearing date (16.04.2026) to clarify why her retraction statement was not recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/10835/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court allowed the applicants' petition to correct procedural defects in their application. The court found that the informant (Sarika Maurya) had retracted her allegations in her Section 161 Cr.P.C. statement, claiming she no longer wished to pursue the matter, and that incident dates did not corroborate the FIR. The court directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh to ensure the informant's personal appearance on the next hearing date (16.04.2026) to clarify why her retraction statement was not recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case